Printer friendly version |   E-mail to a friend |   |  0 41 comment(s)

Published Saturday, May 02, 2009 12:06 AM

By TODD ARCHER
The Dallas Morning News

Comments

(Requires free registration.)



Posted by: Pablo On: 5/13/2009

Comment Title: Stinking troll
So you can read huh?

---

Posted by: On: 5/12/2009

Comment Title: RE: AGS *CAN BEAT TU
correction *can

---

Posted by: On: 5/12/2009

Comment Title: AGS AND BEAT TU
DEFINITELY...THEY CAN BEE THE HECK OUTTA T.U. -TULSA UNIVERSITY NOT TEXAS...LOL. tu tu tu tu tu tu LOL...U GUYS CAN'T EVEN SAY UT....TULSA, TULSA TULSA...LOL...BTW THEY HAVE BETTER RECORD LAST SEASON THAN YOU GUYS...LOL

---

Posted by: On: 5/5/2009

Comment Title:
Oh my gosh whose legs fell off?

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/5/2009

Comment Title: WHY IS MIKE SHERMAN 40+ POINTS WORSE THAN bayor, ou, okie lite, tu and tech? IT'S THE COACHING STUPID!
My presonal opinions:_____ IN just the past decade, the spread, run pass option, has been developing in only college football, and Urban Meyers won the mnc last year and previously with his version!_____There are many variations of the spread, run pass option; defend the pass, they run; defend the run, they pass._____Mike Sherman was out of college football since '96 along with nolan, rossely, and kines, was never with a team running it and has little exposure to defending it?_____Hence, our coaching is 40+ points blowout cluless about today's college football, and all the teams that run variations ofthe spread, run pass option?_____Similarily, in recruiting, we finally, in Shermans fourh signing class with multiple offers out, started offering early?_____What we haven't started yet, is the use of every day common people oriented skills necessary to commit todays top players, and keep them!_____Hence we are 40+ point losers at recruiting , too?_____IT'S THE COACHING STUPID!_____miller58

---

Posted by: Spock On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title:
sportif, remember the two meters to the northwest? well just forget it for now. our uh beam-up capability is like, well you know, on the fritz. so for now my man you just need to "stand still" and stare up at us til we decide, I mean, get this thing working again. watch the traffic. (ok, give me 100 percent power on both reactors scotty and set the throttles at warp 7).

---

Posted by: sportif On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title:
man i'm telling you jocks are stupids caquse i saw that footage on tv and that tarp looked like it was gonna collapse but these jocks just stood still and stared at the ceiling until it feLl on them. hey if i'm crossing a street and i see a car coming at me...i'm gonna run not stand there and stare at it I'M GONNA RUN.

---

Posted by: Spock On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title:
sportif, what planet are you beaming in from. Your gamma ray missed its target i think. Move two meters to the northwest and we will beam u back up.

---

Posted by: sportif On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title:
this article was supoosed to be about that man who lost his legs, but the responses reveal that ppl don't care about the tragedy. these sports freaks use kids for their youth and strength and throw them away once they have an injury or older. basically these players are ruining their bodies for your entertainment. this guy who lost his legs will never walk again, he probably has played sports all his life, but now his legs don't work he will be nothing to the sports community. sooo sad, i heart goes out to the family.

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title: RE; Objective Homer
My personal opinions:_____Objective Homer, always enjoy your comments!_____I present the true facts in context for others, and make my own comments based on these true facts!_____I do not hesitate to make unpopular comments, if the facts bare them out._____I believe I observed just possibly, some former football players, their friends and A&M employees had seperate agendas in loud and long unfair out of context criticism, and not strong support of another A&M employee, Fran, not in the interest of my goal of A&M winning an mnc!_____miller58

---

Posted by: Objective_Homer On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title: Fran & Sherm
DRLGSIDEWAYS- I rpomise you will also be happy when sherman leaves. I was happy when they hired fran. He had a track record of sucess. How happy can you be about hiring sherman with zero college headcoach experiance let alone a sucessful track record. Let alone youthful age and or modernized offensive and defensive schemes and no real record of good recruting. Technically it is too early to tell but REALISTICLY we can all see that its a failure waiting to happen. Miller is crazy and extereme and defends fran for no reason but he is spot on about Sherm.

---

Posted by: On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title: McGee
I thought this article was about McGee. I say Best of Luck to a first class man.

---

Posted by: Seeing Stars On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title: RE: drlgsideways - "too early to tell"
It will not be "too early to tell" at the end of this season. You state with no real indications of improvement (big subjective area) that a coaching change should be made and I for one agree. Back to the poll. It seems one disappointment would be another remake of the defense. Not due to injury but due to effectiveness. To defend these new attacks look around the nation and you see the trend of placing athletes and speed on the field at the expense of some size. Big safetys are moved to OLB slots and OLB's are moved to DE slots. Everything is moving up to cover the speedy slot receivers, backs, and perimeter running games. You have to know this defensive version we are implementing will not stand up through the season. While effective with some parts of the attack, it becomes very vulnerable in other areas. Another disappointment is nobody is CLEARLY stepping up to take McGee's spot as the leader. And something that bothers me is that we are in NO position to be responding to leach's comments with official statements. The rest of the conference is loving every second of it. Leave it alone. We will see what happens.

---

Posted by: drlgsideways On: 5/4/2009

Comment Title: If I am Dridge
I prefer answers to questions. You did not answer any of them but only tossed out the stuff that you post over and over and over again. And predictably, you fell back on the hypothetical, mythical recruiting class Francione had coming. Where were the previous classes? Would you like to plot the number of points surrendered by A&M over the last 10 -12 years and then point out when Francione arrived on campus? A&M's grand defensive legacy was thrown out because "Slocum left the cupboard bare with too few linebackers to run the 3-4". Yet 4 to 5 years later A&M is starting a Juco transfer and an exArmy "old" guy at linebacker in a freaking 5-2 because of a lack of depth. And you never respond to this. You always offer up the crap that Francione was fired just before he had the chance to restock the empty cupboard he inherited from Slocum. But you want to fire Sherman because he has left the cupboard bare after two recruiting classes when the final grade on those classes are not in (and one has not played a single snap). And that final grade is not determined by one of the many recruiting services or by you or Stars or me. It will be determined by the players' development. Studs in high school are all too frequently duds in college. Or you go on and on about losing in recruiting in the out years 2010, 2011? Really? Seriously? We know how good a kid is going to be when he is a sophomore in high school? And we also know the kid won't change his mind and decommit? Francione kept Torbush who should be called Tortchbush or Toast for 3 seasons? But Kines should be run off after one season given the mother lode of players Francione left behind? Under Francione it was disaster after disaster. Gave away the OU game in 2006 when everyone in the stadium KNEW he was screwing up. Or how about OU 77 A&M 0 and OU could have put 120 on A&M? Lost to Baylor. For every stat you throw out about Sherman's one season there is a like stat from Francione. Yeah, we beat tu twice but it was more a result of Stephen McGee being a tough, competitive, refuse to lose, leader in the first game. Francione's swan song victory over Texas was the kind of football (offense) we should have been seeing all along. Francione squandered talent on a massive scale. He ruined Reggie McNeal's development with an offense that was basically zone read left, zone read right. You did not need to be a football genius to know that Reggie did not like getting hit. His performance always dropped off immediately after someone lit him up. So having him run zone read and option was a great decision. Francione repeated squandering talent with Stephen McGee. And then after getting fired he blamed McGee and the assistant coaches. But that Francione guy was a hell of a coach wasn't he? I mean look at how Martellus became one hell of a blocker! I knew you would not answer the questions. And Stars how much better was the 2008 Big 12 vs 2004, 2005, 2006, etc? That should be considered as a question for your proposed poll. Again, if at the end of this season, there are no real indications of improvement, then a coaching change should be made. And finally, where will Francione end up coaching next? I was glad when we hired him and I was equally glad when he left. Me, personnaly, I cannot look at his tenure and not write it off as a very large step backwards for the program. So are we making progress with Sherman? It is too early to tell.

---

Posted by: Seeing Stars On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: RE: drlgsideways (sorry)
Sorry, sideways I get the question now. Just wasn't paying attention to the poll. I don't go there because they are manipulated and contrived. For instance. How do you think this poll quetion would be answered. WHY DO YOU THINK SHERMAN IS NOT WINNING MORE GAMES? (A). Because we don't have a good surface for all the speed he recruits (B) Because all the coaches he hired have no college experience to speak of (C) Because he can't recruit (D) Because franchione left him a bare cupboard. ........ Go read the poll again......See what I mean.

---

Posted by: Seeing Stars On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: RE: drlgsideways
It has always been my point that this school is SEVERAL coaching staffs removed from what anyone would consider an annual national contender. You can't compare SWC to B-12 or 1965 to 2010. That's what the fantasy games are for. Franchione couldn't get it done and Sherman is struggling as well. We are not even close to tu or ok who pick our recruiting grounds clean but we are losing ground to baylor and tt either through recruiting or coaching. We sound like tcu. Why do we keep muddling around with these types in the first place. Most schools who can't attract a top coach experience failure because of facilities, fan base, local recruiting opportunity, etc, etc. Been over it all before. A&M suffers from NONE of this. As a matter of fact, they are probably at the top of the nation in any category you, as a prospective coach, would like to measure. So what's the holdup. The problem here is that the school can't get out of it's own way. They either want to be too "involved" (with influential alumni) in what the new coach is doing thus turning off any good prospect that may consider the program OR they never give the process a chance to work in the first place because they make the political hire which eliminates the risk of having their influential alumni upset. Until that mindset is eliminated this potentially very mighty machine will rust in the field. Also, with regard to where the coaches are now. Coaches tend to travel in packs, leaving only one or two behind at each stop. These guys can be traced back to their Holy Cross days. So when the grenade takes out all of them with a head coach firing they are scattered to the wind no matter who they are (slocum). The head coaches also ride out their guaranteed salaries for several years rather than forfeit them with another coaching job. Lastly, I'm not trying to be funny here but I really missed what you were trying to say about "a category for defensive improvement" for my behalf.

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: RE: Sister
My personal opinions:_____Sister, I know of at least two DUI's by Sherman's players in just the past 3 months!_____miller58

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: RE: Dridge - PREFERS LOW IQ MATH?
My personal opinions:_____Dridge prefers Sherman's 40 point tu blow out loss in '08; I prefer two straight wins over tu in '06 and '07!_____Dridge prefers Shermans 7 blowout and the Arkansas state losses in '08: I prefer 7 and 9 win regular seasons in '06 and'07 on the rise from RC's and Sherman's decade lows!_____ Dridge prefers a #99 Sagarin rated Sherman defense of today; I prefer one with the four and five star players at every position, sophs, juniors, and seniors, that we'd have today!_____Dridge prefers the 1 four star and tu having 17 of them in the current class: I prefer the 14 actual commits and the up to 20 difference makers being brought in just as soon as the last of RC's recruits left in '07 and made scholarship room?_____I prefer to hire enginerrs with high IQ_____miller58

---

Posted by: drlgsideways On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: Questions
I do find a few things interesting: 1. Miller demanding answers when he avoids questions tossed to him: Why couldn't Francione establish ANY semblance of a defense in his five or was it six recruiting classes? Same question regarding the offensive line. 2. How has Sherman left the cupboard bare after two recruiting classes (one of which reports this fall) given the situation with Francione mentioned above in question 1. 3. Where is the mighty, savvy, up to date, modern, coaching staff Francione assembled? Could you please list the high schools, jucos and small colleges where they are currently working? 4. Any thoughts by anybody on the results to the poll question regarding the biggest disappointment in this spring training? I can't speak for Jim Bob but I swear I have not been padding the results in favor of the offensive line. I wish they had included a category for defensive improvement for Stars behalf. My personal opinion:_____our defensive looks good when they are going against our offense. Rebuilding a stud offensive line will also help our defense get better. Francione was a disaster. I don't see how anyone can come up with any other conclusion unless you are his mom or his wife. And Miller don't go getting all nostalgic about what might have been had Francione stayed. He had a hell of lot more time than Sherman and you seem perfectly content to run Sherman out but forgive Francione?

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: SINCE SHERMAN WAS HIRED IN NOVEMBER'07, HOW'S HE RECRUITED?
My personal opinions:_____Simply crappy!_____In Feb'08 Sherman signed just 7 four star difference makers; Mac signed 12._____In Feb'09 Sherman dropped to just 5; but mac improved to 14!_____In this class, Sherman has dropped to only 1 commit; but mac has improved to 17 commits._____See a trend?_____And Sherman alrady has multiple offers out for the next class, but 0 commits?_____The Aggie Spin Machine doesn't like comparing 4*/5* difference maker recruiting because it enables even the most novice football fan to quickly evaluate recruiting!_____With Sherman allowing mac to gain the 30 extra difference makers above, mac will be playing for the mnc this year, and Sherman playing to try to maintain our Big 12 south last place #99 Sagarin rating?_____Thanks to the few idiots and A&M employees, that supported hiring a head coach with 0 college head coach experience, and 9 assistants with almost 0 top recruiting experience._____ How simply stupid to bring in someone like this, when the record shows that the previous coach had just beaten tu twice, had us up from RC's and Sherman's decade lows, to win 7 and 9 regular season games; and A&M actually commtted 14 difference makers and Fran was bringing up to 20 four and five star difference makers to the '08 season._____That 20 four and five star difference makers woul;d all be sophs this season and we'd be winning big!_____ And neither us or the other reported half dozen schools putting out a newsletter, will ever be hearing about it again._____There are at least a dozen good head coaches that could immediately come in and recruit lights out the first full season; and have us competing for the Big 12 in their second full season?_____let's do it!_____miller58

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: Re: CenterL - others
My personal opinions:_____CinterL - others, When you compared the tu list to the AY list, about ten of the Ag commits are not even on the tu lsr 100 list at all?_____Does this mean these Ags, not even on the tu lsr 100 list, will be rated at 2 star, or lower because they are 100 to 850 positions or more, lower ?_____Also unless the four players above the 4 star player, Apo I believe, are exactly the same position as Apo, players from 50+ other states may completely push these four off the list to 2 or 3 star fate, when their higher rankings are sorted by position?_____Reportedly among other reasons, Sherman was fired from Greenbay for his inability to evaluate player personel, that resulted in multiple lost games over his years there, so dream on about any Sherman's ability to evaluate players?_____But even if all 16 Ags turn out to be only 2 & 3 stars, they certainly won't stop the blow out losses, but the sheer quantity, certainly will at least falsely inflate our team recruiting ranking much higher?_____If your Aggie Spin Machine bs is to be believed, about how good these recruiting classes are, then Nick Saban won 12 regular season games in the tough sec last year, so Sherman should be expected to do the same, because Sherman is in exactly the same position?_____But we all intelligently know thast won't happen, because you're just completely full of Aggie Spin Machine bs about how good these recruiting classes are!_____Reminds me of the completely false lies, "emphasis on recruiting" speil after each of our 10 coaches was hired in November'07 ? Don't even bother to answer, because no one could believe your answer is truthful, after some of the ridiculous statements made below! _____miller58

---

Posted by: Sister On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: Re; Seeing Stars
Thanks for setting that straight. It is amazing what some of these posters put up. Miller must be too busy laughing to comment.

---

Posted by: On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: "Drug" dealers
All of you selling speed must be using something else. Take the class you speak of and tell us who in that class is faster than what we already have. This site has proved you wrong over and over on that and yet you still sing the song. Even Cessna dropped the subject when he took a look.

---

Posted by: Seeing Stars On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: RE: SISTER & anonymous post
SISTER, don't waste a lot of time trying to find RIVALS headquaters in austin. Their headquarters address is: Ten Cadillac Drive, Suite 400, Brentwood, Tennessee 37027. For advertising: 770 Broadway, Suite 221, N.Y., N.Y. 10003.

---

Posted by: Seeing Stars On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title:
Bottom Line---Sherman will have to get familiar with today's college game before he can recruit the right talent for it. Everyone out there must know that the game and the 2010 teenager is different today than they were 12-15 years ago when the majority of this staff was last involved.

---

Posted by: Sister On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: Re; CenterL and the unknown poster
CenterL, I understand your point. Don't know if I agree but I can understand your reasoning. Thanks for the post. The final analysis will prove us right or wrong. To the unknown poster, how can you say sherman has this player evaluation gift that seems to escape all other top program coaches in the nation. If he does then how can he watch kids all year and continue to switch them from position to position and from offense to defense, not because of injuries but because he thinks "after watching him for a year he feels his natural position" is more suited to where he moved him to this time. And if he knew so much about player evaluation why do we keep shifting defenses around as he realizes a little late that he needs more speed on the field than what he thought he had with the first group. Oh, and the rest of the entire nation has decided that if a kid commits to tu he will get a higher star ranking than if he commits to usc, fla, A&M, etc. Thats weak. And now you tell me he can watch 50 feet of tape and talk to the local minister and make a call on a kid who graduates more than a year from now. I am with Seeing Stars on this sort of thing. Justify how you commit a kid as a quarterback who has never been the starter at his school or another one who is an option quarterback for a pro-style offense he has never run or demonstrated proficiency at. And we might do well to stop waving the character integrity flag because you don't know those things til at least a year after you sign him and that monster is already raising its head with that last dwi.

---

Posted by: On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title:
miller should be totally ignored. Sherman & staff do their own evaluations. Rivals is based in austin & compiles opinions. tu commits get high ratings because they are tu commits (they've got good ones, don't get me wrong - just understand the system a little). Sherman & staff are bring in players to fill needs. These are experienced coaches evaluating 17 year old kids. They did pretty good on short notice with '08 class, they've done even better with '09 coming in this summer - lot's of help & lots of speed. Word on the steet IN COLLEGE STATION is the class of '10 will be an very good class, possibly OUTSTANDING!!! So far, Sherman & staff have upgraded classes each year so far. What more can you ask for? They are all young men w/ outstanding character, grades & athletic ability. We're on the right road & just need time to develop this talent. Also understand, miller loves Fran & Fran totally left the cupboard bare in offensive & defensive linemen, linebackers, receivers, etc, etc, etc..

---

Posted by: Objective_Homer On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: Miller
Miller's passion though extreme is closer to a realistic take than just about every other poster on this site. If you want to be hopeful then so be it. If you want to be realistic then challenge miller with FACTS that dispute his concerns. Calling him names and bullying him around only proves that his info is truly worth being concerned about. You cant say we will never be equal to TX and OU in one breath and predict 9 or more wins in the next. There are other teams between OU and TX that we cannot beat which totally squashes many of the W/L predictions i see here. Lets worry about middle tier before we worry about upper tear wins. Or just continue to be hopeful which is fine but dont bash miller as he seems to be the ONLY person truly worried about a program that cant crack the top 100.

---

Posted by: CinterL On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: Sorry about the second question.
Yes I forgot to address the question, sorry. The reason why most of the prospects are not ranked is because rivals do not have film to rank them. Since there is an abundance of prospects around the country, it takes an extremely long time to either see in real life, or watch tape of everyone. The ones that are ranked are usually from powerhouse schools and have already created a lot of buzz around their name. However these early evaluations can change because of the way people play as seniors. Also it takes into account their development over the spring and summer months. Also I would like to explain my line of reasoning. On the link Ros Appo is rated a 4*, there are 5 prospects ranked ahead of him on aggie yell. Yes I know this is how A&M ranks them but look at http://tamu.rivals.com/viewrank.asp?ra_key=2142, this is t.u. site. There are still 4 players ranked higher than John Harris another 4* for t.u., that are committed to A&M, by their rankings. I just assumed that instead of Ros Appo and John Harris loosing a star that everyone ahead of him will receive a 4* rating, when it us updated.

---

Posted by: Sister On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: Re; CenterL
I went to the site as well and cannot find any new information that would confirm players will move up the rankings list. This site also seems to be slanted from the AggieYell.com perspective. We will just have to wait on the new rankings update to confirm anything just as you have stated. My second question remains puzzling and maybe you or miller can help with this. Why would some players already have a four or five star ranking and have a spot in the National Top 250 while others are not ranked at all. I realize there will be some movement in the system but it will be minimal in overall numbers. My bottom line question is: if significant numbers of these players at any school will go from unranked to a four+ star ranking then why were they skipped over in the first ranking results.

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: RE; CinterL - PLEASE JUST ANSWER Sister's TWO QUESTIONS?
My personal opinions:_____CinterL, I would appreciate it, if you would just answer Sister's two questions?_____I found nothing new at your rivals link to change any present or expected future facts?_____Your post appears to be either Aggie Spin Machine bs, or just pitiful unfounded unsubstanciated hope?_____CinterL, which is it?_____Thanks_____miller58

---

Posted by: milla_hata On: 5/3/2009

Comment Title: miller58
My personal opinions:_____miller58 is a complete waste of time_____miller58 is a complete waste of braincells_____miller58 is a complete waste of the human body_____miller58_____miller58 is a complete waste of space on this website_____milla_hata

---

Posted by: CinterL On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: Sister here is the site
Sorry I probably should have posted the site in the first place, thank you for letting me post. http://tamu.rivals.com/viewrank.asp?ra_key=2142 It is the list of the top texas football talent. also it is adjustable and a lot of signees of Texas A&M are moving up. Miller, t.u. will beat us in recruiting this year!!! We get it move on!!! We knew it in feburary for crying out loud. It is not sherman's falut, t.u. just has had more stability and in turn have a head start. From what I see in this class is the expansion to powerhouse schools that will pay off later.

---

Posted by: Sister On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: Re; CenterL
Serious question. Where do you find the list that ranks some of our players ahead of the 4* committed by other teams. Also, why were they not ranked 4* when those other ones were in the beginning.

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: RE: CinterL
My personal opinions:_____CinterL, you really don't get it do you?_____We have 1 four star difference maker committed; and tu has 17 four and five star difference makers committed!_____We need 16 more just to stay even this year!_____Do you understand that?_____Then tu has signed another 36 more the last five years than us!_____Do you realize Sherman now with multiple offers out in his fourth signing class, has dropped us farther behind every class?_____We used to be in third place just behind tu and ou in talent; and and after Feb'10, we will also be behind both okie lite and nebraska as well, in fifth place in talent, and dropping as fast as Sherman can drop us?_____This must just stop immediately!_____SHERMAN JUST MUST GO!_____miller58

---

Posted by: eiland02 On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: McGee
um... Miller, this was a blog about Stephen McGee with the Cowboys. It had nothing to do with A&M or Sherman or recruiting! My personal opinion__Miller needs to be banned from this site as well!

---

Posted by: CinterL On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: Wait until everything us updated!!!
Miller just would like to point out that the ranking are not upated, and that there are many A&M players ranked ahead of some of the 4* difference makers you keep talking about. Here is that list: LB Domonique Patterson, OL Shep Klinke, DE Nehemiah Hicks, RB Ben Malena, and QB Jameill Showers. When the ranking are updated they will probably all be 4* giving us 6 already. Also A&M are believe to be ahead on many top targets like CB Tony Hurd Jr, ATH/S James Haynes, OL Jake Matthews and LB Shaun Lewis. If they do commit to A&M (cross your fingers people and HOPE) then that gives us ten 4*. That is not even including A&M stealing some other recruits, Possibly DT Jay Guy (HOPEING A LOT), and others. Given I know that all of this happening is a long shot but this is all very possible. I agree it depends on how well we do this season. Also Love McGee and he will do great in the NFL, best of luck and Gig'em.

---

Posted by: Bill O. On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: MILLER
Miller tells it like it is. The only cards missing from his deck are the "JOKERS". The spin stops here !!

---

Posted by: miller58minusafewcards On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: minus a few cards
my personal opinion_______: miller58 is minus a few cards in the proverbial deck_______.

---

Posted by: Pablo On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: Just win baby!
If the Aggies put together a 6 or 7 win season, prognosticators like our own Miller58, will have to come up another gripe.. it WILL come down to wins and losses, period.

---

Posted by: miller58 On: 5/2/2009

Comment Title: SINCE MILE SHERMAN WAS HIRED IN NOVEMBER 2007:
My personal opinions:_____The number of 4*/5* difference makers signed are:_____7 in Feb'08;_____5 in Feb'09:_____1 in the current class;_____0 in the next class!_____By contrast, tu has signed 17 difference makers in just the current class?_____What's the problem?_____In just the past 3 weeks, Sherman offers have been turnrd down by 2 DB's committing to ou and nebraska, 2 LB's committing to okie lite and lsu, a RB committing to michigam, an OG committing to 'bama and a DE committing to tech!_____Remember this terrible recruiting for four straight signing clases by Sherman when we are suffering future blow out losses, and some excuse maker says "bare cupboard"!_____miller58

---

Ticket broker Vividseats.com sells great sports tickets including NCAA Football tickets like Aggies football tickets for all games. Check out all the football tickets available today!